普通會員
freecow
rbenabled
avatar
218.103.136.22
金錢: 1928.20
帖數: 2121
GP: 82
LV: 47
交易所:

普立茲獎得主給習總公開信 「誰越過了紅綫」 人氣: 594 回覆: 1


美國具有影響力的《紐約時報》國際事務專欄專家、曾奪得3次普立茲獎的佛里曼(Thomas L. Friedman),昨日發表一封給中國國家主席習近平的公開信。佛里曼呼籲習近平要反腐,而不要怪罪披露中共高層官員腐敗問題的記者。

佛里曼在公開信中表示,《華爾街日報》、路透社中文網最近被封,彭博新聞社和《紐約時報》的網站也被封了好幾個月,《紐時》和彭博新聞社等美國媒體駐華記者需要在12月底之前續簽,但中國政府拒絕發出簽證,這顯然是對新聞機構的報復,原因是披露了包括習近平在內的中國高層領導人的親屬斂財的問題。

佛里曼引述中國專家言論指,習近平認為美國媒體「越過了紅綫」,而習顯然把遊戲規則理解為,外媒、中媒和社交媒體只能報地方和省級官員的腐敗,但決不能報道中共高層領導人的金融交易。

他在公開信對習近平呼籲:「如果你把我們的記者都趕出中國,我可以告訴你將會發生甚麼情況:他們將在香港、台灣、南韓設立辦公室,仔細梳理來自遠方的金融資料,而無法通過在中國旅行,與中國民眾面對面地交談來作出平衡」,並且這將迫使美國驅逐中國記者,「我們不可能讓你享受我們的開放,而你卻蒙蔽我們。」

美國《紐約時報》
普通會員
freecow
rbenabled
avatar
218.103.136.22
金錢: 1928.20
帖數: 2121
GP: 82
LV: 47
交易所:
Code Documentation : https://readme.zkiz.com
此廣告由abbychau所買。想在這裡下廣告嗎? 請按我
MEMO to: China’s President Xi Jinping.
Go to Columnist Page »

Josh Haner/The New York Times
Thomas L. Friedman
From: A Friend of Your Country.

Dear President Xi, in recent years there’s been a tug of war inside the global investment community between those who think China is a bubble about to burst and therefore a “screaming short” and those who believe that China has big problems — but also big tools and smart leaders — and will find a way forward, even if at a more normal growth rate. I lean toward the second camp, but looking at some of China’s recent behavior I’m beginning to wonder: Maybe your system is more frail than I thought?

I say that as someone who wants to see China succeed in empowering its people to realize their full potential so they can better participate in shaping China’s future and integrate with the world. Anyone who is telling you that American policy makers want to see China fail doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Our two economies and fates are totally intertwined today.

So, I wish China’s people well. Many Americans do. That is why I am writing you today. I believe you’re about to make a terrible, terrible mistake.

The Chinese-language websites of The Wall Street Journal and Reuters were recently blocked, and those of Bloomberg News and The New York Times have both been blocked for months. More important, The Times and Bloomberg together have more than 20 journalists in China whose visas are up for renewal by the end of December and, so far, your government is refusing to act on them — in apparent retaliation for both organizations exposing the enormous wealth amassed by relatives of senior Chinese leaders, including yours. The rumor is that you intend to deny both organizations the right to report from China.

China experts tell me that this unprecedented crackdown is prompted by your feeling that we’ve crossed a red line. You apparently thought the rules of the game were that the foreign press, local media and social media could write anything they wanted about corruption and social protests at the local and provincial level — indeed, it was a way for the central government to track and curb corruption — but that such focus should never be brought to the financial dealings of the top leaders of the Communist Party.

Sir, if a red line has been crossed, it has been by your officials and by technology. How so? There have been enough small stories in your own media — tips of icebergs — that suggest a widespread amassing of assets by family members of the most senior Communist Party officials. This kind of asset grab may not be illegal in all cases, but it surely could not happen at this scale without people taking advantage of their positions and the lack of transparency at the top.

Just last March, Chinese authorities quickly deleted from the blogosphere photos of a fatal Beijing car crash, believed to involve the son of a close ally of then-President Hu Jintao. The car was a Ferrari. The driver was killed and two young women with him badly injured. How could such a young man afford a Ferrari?

There was no way the foreign press was going to permanently ignore such stories that so many Chinese were talking about online. And that became even more true with the financialization of your economy and the emergence of a shareholding culture that required your companies and markets to comply with international norms for public filings of corporate structures and shareholders.

It was inevitable that once those filings were in place reporters in China would, as we did, hire accountants and lawyers to scrutinize these public records and discover things — like the fact that former Prime Minister Wen Jiabao’s 90-year-old mother, a retired schoolteacher, had in her name an investment in a large Chinese financial services company valued around $100 million and Wen’s son, daughter, younger brother and brother-in-law had all also become extraordinarily wealthy.

Who crossed the red line here? We’d argue that it was some of your colleagues and their kids in opting for industrial-scale greed — combined with the new technology to expose it. That technology is not going away, so the excesses and corruption better. The Times and Bloomberg did your leadership a huge service in exposing this. It was a warning heart attack. The No. 1 cause of death of Chinese regimes in history is greed and corruption.f you throw all our correspondents out of China, I can tell you exactly what will happen: They will set up offices in Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea and do nothing other than comb through financial records from afar, without the balancing alternative to travel in China, meet and hear from Chinese people face to face, and write with nuance about other issues. Also, it will force us to evict your journalists. We will not let you enjoy our openness while you blind us.

President Xi, you are right that exposure of huge, high-level asset grabs poses an existential threat to your party’s rule. But you’re wrong if you blame those exposing these excesses rather than those perpetrating them.

When China was taking off in the 1980s and 1990s, it could get away with maintaining open markets with a closed political system. I don’t believe that will be possible in this century, certainly not to the degree of the past. Over the last 10 years, the world has gone from connected to hyper-connected. The net effect is that in more and more countries — including China — wealth is getting concentrated at the top, but, at the same time, more power to speak and organize is being distributed at the bottom and more power to see — transparency — is being injected everywhere.

CHINA has more than 300 million micro-bloggers on your Twitter equivalent, Weibo, half of China is now on the Internet and China has 1 billion cellphones in use, many with cameras. There is no way in such a world that the focus on corruption and financial excesses can just stay localized. See dictionary for: Occupy Wall Street, Tahrir Square and Edward Snowden. They are all stories of what happens when wealth gets concentrated at the top, power gets distributed at the bottom and transparency gets injected everywhere.

Beijing ought to be concerned about what the general public will do if the secretive, back-room dealing that has enriched some elites — which every day more Chinese can see and discuss among themselves — remains a forbidden topic for public discussion and reform, and therefore mass protest becomes the only option to address it.

President Xi, for your sake and the sake of stability in China, please don’t make the mistake of blaming the messengers. The Great Chinese Firewall you need to construct can’t be against the truth. It has to be against corruption.

Sincerely yours,

A Friend of China.
訪客
Guest (IP: 3.81.28.10) avatar
(提示:如要觀看隱藏內容, 按此回到第一頁)
此版不容許訪客發貼, 請先登入。

Home RealBlog Stock Endless Choice Fancy Buzz Gloomy Sunday ZKIZ Wiki RealWidgets

geo stats
Powered by RealForum
Paged in 65.9ms (Q=14 + R=5) @ 2020-7-7 01:28 PM Asia/Hong_Kong
Archiver | 廣告聯繫: abbychau (at) gmail.com